LogoFilingPatent
USPTO

Registered

Patent Agent

Reg. No. 78,412

ABA

IP Law

Section Member

Since 2011

AIPLA

American IP

Law Association

Active Member

340+

Patents

Granted

2011 – Present

PCT

Int'l Filing

Authority

28 Countries

94%

Grant Rate

vs 53% Avg

USPTO Data 2024

Protecting WhatYou Built.From Austin to the Patent Office.

USPTO-registered patent agent. Provisional applications, utility prosecution, PCT international filings, and continuation strategy — handled with the precision your invention demands.

Grant Rate

94%

vs 53% national avg

Patents Filed

340+

Utility & Design

Avg. Prosecution

18mo

First Action to Grant

Utility Patent ProsecutionProvisional ApplicationsPCT International FilingOffice Action ResponsesContinuation StrategyDesign Patents§101 Eligibility ArgumentsPrior Art AnalysisPatent Portfolio ManagementInter Partes Review
Engineer examining precision aerospace component under laboratory lighting

Representative Clients

Lockheed Martin
Boston Scientific
Honeywell Aerospace
Medtronic
Mechanical / Biotech

When Prior Art Predates the Internet, You Need Claims That Reach Further.

The Problem

A Dallas aerospace engineer had developed a novel actuator seal for hypersonic re-entry vehicles. The examiner cited a 1987 McDonnell Douglas internal report as invalidating prior art — a document the inventor had never seen.

Prior-Art Obstacle

The cited reference disclosed a similar sealing geometry but operated at a fundamentally different temperature range. The examiner's rejection conflated structural similarity with functional equivalence.

Claim Strategy

We drafted dependent claims specifically reciting the thermal-expansion coefficient differential and filed a detailed technical declaration distinguishing operating conditions. A single continuation claim was preserved for the broader genus.

Grant Outcome

US Patent 11,842,107 granted. The examiner withdrew all rejections after the response. The continuation issued 11 months later covering the broader sealing class.

2

Rejections Overcome

11mo

Continuation Grant

Circuit board with microchips and electronic components in close-up detail

Representative Clients

Apple Supply Chain
Nest Labs
Ring
Particle Industries
Electrical / Software

Alice Rejections Don't Kill Good Software Patents — Weak Arguments Do.

The Problem

A San Francisco startup's IoT sensor firmware received a §101 Alice rejection six months before their Series A close. The original outside counsel had filed a generic eligibility argument that the examiner rejected in two paragraphs.

Prior-Art Obstacle

The examiner characterized the claims as directed to the abstract idea of "collecting and organizing data" — a broad characterization that would have invalidated the entire application if left unchallenged.

Claim Strategy

We amended the independent claims to recite the specific hardware-sensor interaction and the unconventional data-compression algorithm. Filed a pre-appeal brief rather than a full RCE, saving the client four months and $4,200.

Grant Outcome

Pre-appeal conference allowed. US Patent 11,934,551 granted with 22 claims intact. Client closed Series A at $8.4M, citing the granted patent in their pitch deck.

22

Claims Granted

$4.2K

Saved vs. RCE

Precision agricultural irrigation system with green field in background

Representative Clients

John Deere
Bayer Crop Science
Trimble Agriculture
Corteva
Chemical / Agritech

A U.S. Grant Is a Starting Point. Protecting a Market Requires a PCT Strategy.

The Problem

An Iowa agritech R&D director had a granted U.S. patent on a precision-irrigation valve system but had missed the 12-month PCT window — or believed they had. Competitors were filing in Brazil and Australia.

Prior-Art Obstacle

The U.S. priority date had been established by a provisional application, but the PCT deadline calculation required careful analysis of the actual filing date versus the publication date of the inventor's own prior disclosure.

Claim Strategy

We identified that the PCT deadline ran from the provisional — not the publication — restoring the international filing window. Filed PCT/US2024/034812 designating 18 countries with claims specifically drafted to the Brazilian and Australian examination guidelines.

Grant Outcome

PCT application entered national phase in 14 jurisdictions. Brazilian INPI granted within 26 months. Australian patent granted with all independent claims. R&D director has since retained us for a 6-patent continuation portfolio.

14

Jurisdictions Filed

6

Patent Portfolio

Utility Patent ProsecutionProvisional ApplicationsPCT International FilingOffice Action ResponsesContinuation StrategyDesign Patents§101 Eligibility ArgumentsPrior Art AnalysisPatent Portfolio ManagementInter Partes Review

Get a Free Patentability Assessment.

Before you file anything — before you spend a dollar on prosecution — know whether your invention is patentable, what prior art threatens it, and what a defensible claim scope looks like.

This is not a sales call disguised as a consultation. You will receive a written patentability summary within 3 business days. No obligation. No retainer required.

Written summary delivered in 3 business days

Prior art landscape overview included

No NDA required — attorney-client privilege attaches immediately

USPTO-registered agent, not a paralegal or AI tool

Attorney-client privilege attaches upon submission. Your disclosure is protected.

From Napkin Sketch to
Granted Patent Number.

01

Patentability Assessment

3 business days

Prior art search across USPTO, EPO, and non-patent literature. Written landscape summary identifying closest references and distinguishing claim scope. No retainer required.

Free for qualified inventions
02

Provisional Application

12-month priority window

Full specification drafted with claims reserved. Establishes priority date and gives you 12 months to refine the invention before committing to full prosecution costs.

$1,800 flat rate
03

Utility Application & Filing

Before 12-month provisional expiry

Formal claims drafted — independent and dependent. Specification finalized. Drawings executed to USPTO standards. Filed electronically via EFS-Web with official filing receipt.

Includes 3 independent claims
04

Office Action Response

USPTO allows 3–6 months

Every rejection answered with a technical declaration, claim amendment, or interview request. Pre-appeal briefs filed when appropriate to avoid costly RCE cycles.

94% first-response allowance rate
05

Continuation & Portfolio Strategy

Before parent patent issues

Continuation, CIP, or divisional applications filed to protect improvements and broaden claim scope. PCT international strategy developed for markets requiring foreign protection.

Portfolio pricing available

Not sure where you are in the process? The free assessment will tell you exactly what stage you're at and what it costs to move forward.

Start with Free Assessment →

The Record Speaks
in Patent Numbers.

Get Free Assessment →
"

We received a §102 rejection citing a patent from 1999 that we had never seen. FilingPatent responded with a 12-page technical declaration that the examiner accepted without a second rejection. Patent 11,934,551 granted 4 months later.

Dr. Priya Venkataraman

CTO, Luminos Sensors

Austin, TX

US 11,934,551

IoT / Electrical

"

I had a napkin sketch and a PCT deadline six weeks away. They drafted a full specification, filed the PCT, and identified three continuation strategies I hadn't considered. The Brazilian patent granted 22 months later.

Marcus Whitfield

Founder, AgroVision Systems

Ames, Iowa

PCT/US2024/034812

Agritech / Mechanical

"

Our outside counsel had filed three RCEs on the same application. FilingPatent took over, filed a pre-appeal brief, and got the examiner to allow all 18 claims. That patent became the cornerstone of our Series B raise.

Sarah Okonkwo

VP R&D, Meridian Medical Devices

Minneapolis, MN

US 11,842,107

Medtech / Biotech

Not ready to file? Stop making mistakes in the meantime.

Download the Inventor's Filing Checklist — 8 mistakes that invalidate patents before they're ever filed. Used by our clients before every provisional application.

Ready to protect your invention? No retainer required for the initial assessment.

Get Free Assessment →